|
|
| Author |
Message |
lork
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:48 pm Post subject: what a nut |
|
|
All-In on a paired board and he didn't even have the top 2 pair. Granted this was a 5 person max table but it still seems like a foolish play to me. The funny thing is I thought about this a moment since my kicker was not top but I knew I had no choice but to call. This guy had been very aggressive post flop the whole time I played this table so the all-in shouldn't really surprise me.
Seat 3: wattheuface ($48.10 in chips)
Seat 5: xave4000 ($24.10 in chips)
Seat 6: dek1141 ($34.55 in chips)
Seat 9: StarlightCst [QH,10C] ($21.50 in chips)
Seat 10: ThomYorke x ($15.20 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
StarlightCst posts blind ($0.25), ThomYorke x posts blind ($0.50).
PRE-FLOP
wattheuface folds, xave4000 calls $0.50, dek1141 folds, StarlightCst calls $0.25, ThomYorke x checks.
FLOP [board cards 9H,6D,10H ]
StarlightCst checks, ThomYorke x checks, xave4000 checks.
TURN [board cards 9H,6D,10H,10D ]
StarlightCst checks, ThomYorke x bets $1, xave4000 bets $23.60 and is all-in, StarlightCst calls $21 and is all-in, ThomYorke x folds.
RIVER [board cards 9H,6D,10H,10D,7D ]
SHOWDOWN
xave4000 shows [ 6C,7S ]
StarlightCst shows [ QH,10C ]
xave4000 wins $2.60, StarlightCst wins $42.50.
SUMMARY
Dealer: dek1141
Pot: $47.10, (including rake: $2)
wattheuface, loses $0
xave4000, bets $24.10, collects $2.60, net -$21.50
dek1141, loses $0
StarlightCst, bets $21.50, collects $42.50, net $21
ThomYorke x, loses $1.50 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arcfinn
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So he bluffed with his whole stack ($23.60) in order to get a $2.50 pot and he only had 4 outs. One of his outs may have been counterfieted and none of his outs were good if you had a boat, which was very possible since the pot was unraised. Hmmm... yes there are really bad players out there.
NEVER GO BROKE IN AN UNRAISED POT!
Obviously, he was trying to grab the pot with a bluff after your weak lead in bet. But a bet of $4 would have accomplished the same thing without the risk of losing his entire stack.
Add him to your list and play on. Nice find. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DeepBlue
Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe, very true - thats the kind of player who needs to have a practice offline. If he'd played something like poker academy, a lovely big box pops up on your screen telling you that's a bad move, perhaps he may learn that way
Either that or when he blows too many stacks betting high for little reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Quick Reply and Actions |
| |
| |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
| |
|